<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<!-- Hand crafted by AutoCCamel -->
<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
<title>Stop Turbines In North Cornwall Whats new</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/</link>
<description>News and Info about developments in wind farms in North Cornwall and related wind turbine news</description>
<webmaster>webmaster@stinc.co.uk</webmaster>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Temporary Meteorological Mast at Davidstow</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID032.shtml</link>
<status>Planning Application</status>
<date>15/07/2008</date>
<description>Application update</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The Big Visual Debate - 8th July 2008</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID031.shtml</link>
<status>By Colin Caudery of STINC</status>
<date>08/07/2008</date>
<description>ES are public consultation documents; they are an integral part of a legal planning application. The primary purpose of the visuals within is to provide the public and members of planning committees with a proper sense of size and scale. At present this is sadly lacking in wind farm application ES. As turbines are getting ever higher this matter requires the utmost attention; wind farm applications have for too long relied upon a distortion of the visuals.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Planning application progress</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID030.shtml</link>
<status>email update from Mr A Goodenough</status>
<date>30/06/2008</date>
<description>Application update</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>A cosy cartel</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID028.shtml</link>
<status>Author: Colin Cauder</status>
<date>31/05/2008</date>
<description>Planners do not require recognised standards to be followed with planning applications and as a result the public are being mislead.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>RATS Website</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID029.shtml</link>
<status>In public domain</status>
<date>15/05/2008</date>
<description>Simple visual height comparisons of turbines with buildings on Carland Cross website. [Please note our comments in "A Cosy Cartel" - these are simple height comparisons not photo montages!!]</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>No 10 Petitions</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID012.shtml</link>
<status>Action you could take</status>
<date>09/05/2008</date>
<description>The Prime Minister's No 10 Petition system enabling us to petition for our views to be taken into account</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Planning application progress</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID019.shtml</link>
<status>Planning Application</status>
<date>09/05/2008</date>
<description>Application update</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Delabole wind farm application</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID013.shtml</link>
<status>Planning Application</status>
<date>26/04/2008</date>
<description>Application update</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Morwenstow Wind Farm gets the green light</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID001.shtml</link>
<status>In public domain</status>
<date>03/04/2008</date>
<description>Controversial plans to create a wind farm in the heart of Hawker country, near Morwenstow, have been given the go-ahead.The Planning Inspectorate upheld an appeal by West Coast Energy and granted permission to build three turbines at Crimp near the Devon-Cornwall border.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Huge expansion for wind turbines</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID002.shtml</link>
<status>In public domain</status>
<date>09/12/2007</date>
<description>There could be more than two offshore wind turbines per mile of UK coastline under plans being set out by ministers.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Effect on the air defence radar</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID005.shtml</link>
<status>In public domain</status>
<date>20/11/2007</date>
<description>Top brass from the RAF gave evidence where they claimed that 18 turbines planned near South Charlton would have a “massive effect” on the air defence radar at Brizlee Wood.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Turbines could end area's Harry Potter role</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID006.shtml</link>
<status>In public domain</status>
<date>20/11/2007</date>
<description>Big-budget film and television drama producers could call cut on north Northumberland if the Middlemoor wind farm goes ahead, an industry scout has warned.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Three Scottish windfarms switched off</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID008.shtml</link>
<status>Attributed to Press and Journal - unchecked</status>
<date>10/11/2007</date>
<description>Three Scottish windfarms were "switched off" yesterday after a massive turbine collapsed in high winds.
The machine, which stands more than 200ft tall at a windfarm in Argyll, apparently "bent in half" during the storm conditions that swept Scotland on Thursday.
Operator Scottish Power stopped the 26-turbine facility ahead of a probe into the cause of the collapse.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Sarkozy announces new wind turbine policy</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID009.shtml</link>
<status>In public domain</status>
<date>06/11/2007</date>
<description>This new policy marks the end of industrial wind turbine installations in rural and wild areas of France.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Fullbrook wind farm decision letter</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID004.shtml</link>
<status>Letter</status>
<date>09/10/2007</date>
<description>Outcome of the public inquiry process into the 22 turbine Fullbrook Windfarm in North Devon. Note the requirements in section 4.5  for lighting the turbines at night.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Anti-Wind Farm Exhibition in Enfield Park, Camelford</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID007.shtml</link>
<status>Author: STINC</status>
<date>06/10/2007</date>
<description>STINC's first Anti-Wind Farm Exhibition</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Costing The Earth</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID003.shtml</link>
<status>In public domain</status>
<date>30/08/2007</date>
<description>Despite the government having subsidised the wind industry to the tune of half a billion pounds so far - as yet its failed to deliver half of one per cent of our electricity needs.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Prince Charles: wind farms are horrendous</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID011.shtml</link>
<status>In public domain</status>
<date>07/08/2004</date>
<description>The Prince of Wales believes that wind farms are a "horrendous blot on the landscape" and that their spread must be halted before they irreparably ruin some of Britain's most beautiful countryside.</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Wind farms 'make people sick who live up to a mile away'</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID027.shtml</link>
<status>Daily Telegraph Website</status>
<date>25/01/2004</date>
<description>Investigation into sickness claimed to be due to Bears Down windfarm</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Peat bogs and turbines</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID017.shtml</link>
<status>Author: STINC</status>
<date></date>
<description>A collection of articles identifying some of the problems with disturbing peat bogs</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rare bees identified at Davidstow Forestry</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID014.shtml</link>
<status>email from Dr Paul A Gainey</status>
<date></date>
<description>Rare bees identified at Davidstow Forestry</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Cornwall Energy Study</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID018.shtml</link>
<status>Posted on CCC website</status>
<date></date>
<description>Study on sustainable Energy Strategy for Cornwall</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Latest exhibition and website updates</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID015.shtml</link>
<status>Author: STINC</status>
<date></date>
<description>Info about the latest exhibition held by Community Windpower Ltd and updates on their website</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>The risk to birds from the proposed Davidstow Community Windfarm</title>
<link>http://www.stinc.co.uk/newsID016.shtml</link>
<status>By Arthur Boyt, BSc</status>
<date></date>
<description>Detailed information about the birds whose habitat could potentially be severely affected by the proposed development.</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
